BREAKING NEWS!!! $775 MILLION SETTLEMENT REACHED!!
A 775 Million dollar settlement was ordered; Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson held accountable for the dangerous drug Xarelto. They have agreed to settle and pay $775,000,000 to victims of Xarto that have filed lawsuits.
Xarelto, primarily used as a blood thinner is prescribed to help prevent blood clots and protect against strokes. Lawsuit claims have been filed against xarelto due to bleeding complications. The most dangerous side effect of xarelto is internal bleeding that can be fatal. Side effects of xarelto vary in severity from minor internal bleeding to severe complications from blood loss causing death.
Serious risks of wound complications and infection rates after knee and hip surgeries have occurred when taking xarelto. People who take xarelto are at a higher risk of returning back to surgery in 30 days.
With documented side-effects caused by xarelto many surgeons are switching back to older more trusted anticoagulants as legal battles are on the rise for xarelto. The drug does not have an antidote possibly causing fatalities to its users whom fell victim to severe uncontrollable internal bleeding.
Bleeding Side Effects include:
- Uncontrollable internal bleeding
- Brain Hemorrhaging
- Bleeding from the rectum
- Intestinal or abdominal bleeds
- Blood in vomit
- Prolonged bleeding from cuts or gums
Additional side effects include:
- Loss of ability to control movement
- Unusual pain/swelling/discomfort
- Numb or tingling muscles
- Abnormal liver function
- Reduced platelet levels
- Difficulty breathing or swallowing
- Bladder or bowel dysfunction
What Does Xarelto Do?
Xarelto acts as an anticoagulant, it blocks specific clotting proteins in your blood so clotting does not occur. It is often prescribed after hip or knee replacement surgeries. It is also used for atrial fibrillation patients to prevent blood clots from forming due to irregular heartbeats. It treats blood clots like deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus. Xarelto is prescribed to prevent blood clots from forming again.
More than 4,500 lawsuits have currently been filed in connection to Xarelto. Bayer and johnson & johnson have plaintiffs filing against them for bleeding complications and negligence. Many users of Xarelto claimed they were never clearly educated about the risks the medication has. Many saying Bayer failed to disclose the deadly side effects of the drug. Lawsuits have also been fired for financial hardships such as lost wages and emergency treatments. In the case of uncontrollable bleeding, suits have been filed for the encumbrance of funeral expenses.
Studies on Xarelto have been questioned with concerns of data integrity. During FDA trials, studies have been cited for questionable data integrity, not following clinical protocols, as well as several studies cited for under-reporting adverse effects. The FDA determined the results from some studies were unreliable.
Are You Eligible For A Xarelto Lawsuit Settlement?
Have you, or someone you care about, experienced severe bleeding problems after being prescribed Xarelto? If so, it is in YOUR BEST INTEREST to take a few minutes and read this CRITICAL information about Xarelto and its lawsuits.
Xarelto is a name brand of the drug rivaroxaban, an increasingly popular drug jointly developed by Bayer Health Group and Johnson and Johnson, two major pharmaceutical companies. When the drug was first approved in 2011, it showed a lot of promise as an improvement over previous anticoagulant drugs. It was often prescribed to patients either experiencing or at high risk of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or atrial fibrillation.
What are the Xarelto lawsuit settlement amounts?
There were 25,000+ lawsuits settled by Janssen, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical; they settled these in March 2019. Johnson & Johnson will have to pay $775 Million. This is big news for victims that have been injured by the drug Xarelto; an example has been established for new lawsuits to be filed.
While doctors and patients generally understand that any blood thinner or anticoagulant, by definition, carries a higher risk of bleeding, the side effects experienced by many Xarelto patients have ended in serious health issues and even death. Unlike previous blood-thinning medications, this drug has no safety, no “off switch;” even when hospitalized, patients with bleeding or hemorrhages have bled to death, with doctors helpless to treat them.
It doesn’t sound excellent.
Currently, over 25,000 cases are settled against the manufacturers of Xarelto. Should you, or a loved one, be among them?
If you or someone you care about have taken Xarelto and have experienced excessive bleeding, hemorrhaging, or death, the answer is most likely YES. While individual cases vary, the sheer number of patients who have taken action to seek damages after these experiences is overwhelming.
YOU ARE NOT ALONE.
So how can you begin the process of getting the compensation you deserve? This is where the legal experts at CLASS ACTION LEGAL CENTER can help you! We work with hundreds of the best attorneys at dozens of prestigious firms, all to find you the very best representation available! Our clients have already seen hundreds of millions of dollars in awards and settlements from similar cases. There is absolutely NO COST to consult with one of our expert attorneys about your individual case’s merits and details. In fact, there is NO COST for anything unless a settlement is won on your behalf! Unlike your experience with Xarelto, there is NO RISK in contacting CLASS ACTION LEGAL CENTER today.
Still, reading? Good! Here is some more valuable information about the ongoing legal battle being waged on behalf of people harmed by Xarelto:
It is alleged that the drug manufacturers were well aware of studies showing Xarelto had higher rates of serious side effects, including gastrointestinal bleeding.
It is further alleged that the drug manufacturers, despite this knowledge, continued promoting the drug as safe and failed to provide adequate warnings about the known side effects both to doctors and to patients.
If this makes you angry, you’re not alone. The carelessness and disregard alleged here are very serious. Hundreds have already died, and thousands more have had their health negatively impacted by these very nasty side effects. And the manufacturers of these drugs have an army of lawyers who make millions each year, shielding them from the legal ramifications of this kind of profit-driven, destructive decisions. How can you stand against that? You can’t. Not alone.
Luckily, YOU ARE NOT ALONE.
Enlist the ARMY of lawyers at CLASS ACTION LEGAL CENTER to even the odds! We have no fear of taking on Big Pharma and fighting for our clients to get them the outcome and compensation they deserve. Get in touch to hear more about the cases our firms have won and the compensation they’ve secured for our clients.
Don’t waste another minute before taking ACTION! The statute of limitations can run out if too much time has passed since an injury or claim. The best time to act is NOW. The best way to act is to contact CLASS ACTION LEGAL CENTER and get started on the process of securing your compensation TODAY.
The Xarelto Side Effects Lawsuit claims that the medication has too many side effects. Some of these side effects include, but are not limited to:
- Intracranial hemorrhages
- Abdominal hemorrhages
- Severe Internal Bleeding
- Retinal hemorrhages
- Wound infection and complication
- Epidural hematoma
- Brain Hemorrhaging
- Cerebral Hemorrhaging
- Adrenal bleeding
- Excessive blood loss
- Gastrointestinal Bleed
- Coughing up blood
- Bleeding gums
- Bloody stool
- Back pain
- Vomiting blood
- Difficulty swallowing
- Difficulty breathing
- Bladder dysfunction
- All anticoagulant drugs, including Xarelto, pose the risk of serious side effects, including:
- Uncontrollable or irreversible bleeding
- An increased risk of stroke after discontinuing use
Due to the lack of antidote available for Xarelto, there is nothing readily available to quickly diminish these side effects, as there are for other anticoagulants. There is no near end for the suits, with approximately 2,000 current cases in the class-action lawsuit and more expected to be filed.
The Never-Ending Cases of Pharmaceutical Xarelto Lawsuits
Multiple lawsuits are filed for multiple drugs on the market. The main reason for these Xarelto cases relates to the adverse side effects of the medication. Other reasons to file a pharmaceutical lawsuit include:
●They have been Falsifying clinical trial results to conceal side effects.
●Refusing to inform the public about risks associated with the medication
●Misrepresenting the drug’s safety consumption in advertising
●Negligent design, research, manufacturing, and marketing of the products
●Reimbursement for pain, suffering, emotional distress, medical expenses, lost earnings, or other economic damages resulting from taking the drug.
One of the better-known examples is the Eliquis lawsuit, causing approval for the blood thinner to be delayed for nine months, pending opposing claims of safety and efficacy. Results from that investigation included:
●Inaccurate and missing data
●Incorrect doses and medications are given to patients.
●Adverse events, including death, remaining unreported.
Those harmed by similar blood thinners, including Xarelto, have filed thousands of cases against the respective manufacturers for failing to warn about the drug’s risks. After the controversial approval of Eliquis, legal experts expected it to cause similar complications. With current lawsuits filed, it is clear that each Xarelto lawyer has a lot of work to do!
Xarelto Lawsuit update for January 2021:
One thing that is universal about lawsuits is that they take a long time before a verdict is made. The Xarelto lawsuits have been pending since approximately 2014, as new data is still being collected for people to file a Lawsuit. Though there are many adverse effects associated with this drug, it has helped a lot of people. On March 25th, 2019, the wait was over; they settled for $750 Million to get paid out to victims.
Until the medication is removed from the market for being unsafe for consumption, there should be no reason to avoid taking the drug. Your medical professional will be able to provide ample advice and information on Xarelto, and you will know if you can file a lawsuit. They know the medication’s side effects and let you know if they recommend it for your condition. If you want to know more about these lawsuits or want more information on this anticoagulant
Xarelto, Bayer AG, and Janssen Pharmaceutical’s block-buster anticoagulant drug, has come under fire in several high-profile lawsuits. Xarelto was marketed as a safer alternative to warfarin, the benchmark anticoagulant, but it has been discovered that using Xarelto can lead to uncontrollable bleeding events. There is no approved antidote for Xarelto, which makes uncontrolled bleeding extremely dangerous and in some cases fatal. Plaintiffs argue that they were not given proper warning of the drug’s perilous side effects and that the drug should never have been brought to market.
Xarelto poses serious risks, including:
- Gastrointestinal bleeding
- Bleeding in the brain
- Complications arising from uncontrollable bleeding
- Bleeding events that can be fatal
More information about Xarelto lawsuits and the drug itself
Xarelto (the brand name for rivaroxaban) is an oral blood thinner/anticoagulant designed to prevent and to treat a condition called deep vein thrombosis (DVT). DVT is a condition in which a blood clot forms in the legs or pelvic area that blocks the passage of blood and leads to excessive pressure on the vein when blood collects behind the clot. That pressure can cause the clot or a portion of the clot to break free and travel through the veins to the lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism (PE), which can be a life-threatening event. There have been people this has gone horribly wrong for and they had to file a lawsuit. Xarelto was developed to reduce the risk of DVT and PE and to treat some cases of DVT after clots have developed. It is also sometimes used to prevent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation or irregular heartbeat and is often prescribed to patients after a hip or knee replacement to reduce the likelihood of the formation of blood clots after surgery.
Xarelto is a profitable drug, bringing Johnson & Johnson and Bayer AG over $1 billion in 2014 and over $2 billion per year in 2015 and 2016. Sales for the drug are expected to approach $4 billion in 2019. Several major lawsuits brought by patients against the drug’s manufacturers argue that the company prioritized Xarelto’s profit potential over safety, putting patients at risk. Plaintiffs have filed a lawsuit against Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceutical, demanding that the manufacturers compensate them for their medical costs, pain and suffering, and funeral costs for patients who have suffered fatal side effects.
The most common complaint against Johnson & Johnson and Bayer AG is that the drug caused uncontrollable bleeding events and that patients were not properly warned of such events’ risk. Because there is no antidote for Xarelto, uncontrolled bleeding episodes can be hazardous and even fatal. Attorneys have argued that Bayer AG and Janssen Pharmaceutical knew of the risks of uncontrollable bleeding and the lack of an antidote but rushed the drug through clinical trials to get it to market anyway and did not adequately inform consumers of the risks the drug poses.
Were patients aware of the risk of uncontrollable bleeding events and that there is no antidote for Xarelto? Attorneys say they would not have chosen to take Xarelto and opted to use warfarin, which has several approved antidotes. They also argue that the claim that Xarelto requires less monitoring than warfarin amounts to negligence on the part of Bayer AG and Janssen Pharmaceutical because additional monitoring might have helped to prevent some internal bleeding events patients have suffered while taking Xarelto.
After Xarelto’s 2011 release, the first lawsuit came in 2014 in Pennsylvania, when Virginia Turtleneck filed the lawsuit Bayer AG, claiming that it caused gastrointestinal bleeding that required emergency treatment and hospitalization. Her attorneys argued that Bayer AG knew of the risk of uncontrollable bleeding and the fact that the drug has no antidote, and that they intentionally misled the public to increase sales.
Subsequently, a medical device used during the ROCKET-AF clinical trial for Xarelto, the INRatio, was recalled by its manufacturer, Alere Inc. Plaintiffs in several Xarelto suits argue that the device did not function properly and provided readings that made Xarelto appear more effective than warfarin. This was more than enough evidence to file a lawsuit. Their attorneys say that this is further proof that Bayer AG and Janssen Pharmaceutical were reckless and negligent in their rush to bring the high-profit anticoagulant to market. Bayer AG and Janssen Pharmaceutical currently face over 4500 cases that have been consolidated into a class-action suit in Louisiana and suits in several other states. There are at least 7200 such suits in progress, with the first round expected to go to trial in early 2017.
If you or someone you care about has suffered an injury after taking Xarelto, contact us to learn if you have a Lawsuit.
Our experienced partner attorneys can help determine if you are entitled to compensation.
Blood clotting is the mechanism by which the body heals itself after an injury to body tissues. Plasma, the liquid component of blood, is made up of several proteins and enzymes which combine with a type of blood cells called platelets to form clots while the body heals itself. Injuries set the process in motion and result in a chain chemical reaction involving several factors that lead to the formation of thrombin, an enzyme responsible for the ultimate formation of blood clots. Thrombin causes a reaction that leads to the conversion of the protein fibrinogen to a different protein called fibrin. Fibrin allows platelets to bind to form a blood clot to stem the loss of blood in the event of an injury.
In some cases, however, this process goes awry and clots can form inside the blood vessels. This type of clot is known as a thrombus and can be very dangerous. Thrombus clots can dislodge and travel through the bloodstream to vital organs, where they can block the flow of blood those organs need to function properly, which is called thromboembolism. This is especially dangerous when it involves the lungs, brain, or heart.
There are several factors that can put someone at a greater risk for forming a thrombus that leads to thromboembolism. There are two types of blood vessels that can be affected by a clot. This problem could be a reason to file a lawsuit. When a clot forms in the veins, which carry blood from the organs back to the heart, it causes what is known as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a very common condition that can cause severe pain and swelling when pressure builds up behind the blood clot. DVT poses a serious danger due to the possibility of the clot breaking free to travel to the heart and lungs, causing a pulmonary embolism (PE). Several factors can indicate an increased risk for developing DVT, including:
Reduced circulation due to restricted movement. This can often occur during long flights or bus rides in cramped seating.
Vein injury such as with a broken bone or surgery (such as hip or knee replacement)
A prior history of DVT
- Blood disorders that cause thickened blood
- Taking certain birth control pills
- Advanced age
Clots can also occur in the arteries that bring pressurized, oxygenated blood from the heart to the organs. Clots that develop in the arteries are more common in patients whose arteries have hardened due to a build-up of plaque along the walls of the artery, a condition known as atherosclerosis. This results in a build-up of blood pressure that can cause the plaque along the artery walls to burst, setting off a molecular reaction that can lead to the formation of a clot that can travel to the brain, causing a stroke, or to the heart, causing a heart attack.
Prior to FDA approval of Xarelto, the only FDA-approved blood thinner/anticoagulant available was Coumadin (warfarin), made by Endo Laboratories, which was approved for use in 1954. The two drugs are not usually interchangeable and work in very different ways. Warfarin works by preventing the body from recycling the vitamin K present in the bloodstream, which is a key factor in the formation of blood clots. With less available vitamin K, the blood takes longer to clot. Patients who use warfarin must have frequent blood tests to ensure that their dosage is correct and must watch their diets for foods heavy in vitamin K. Regular blood tests are required to determine how long it takes a patient’s blood to clot. This is measured on the International Normalized Ratio (INR) scale. A high INR indicates an increased risk for an uncontrollable bleeding event, whereas a low INR indicates an increased risk for abnormal blood clotting.
When the FDA approved the sale of generic versions of warfarin in the 1990s, the price of the drug dropped dramatically, which led pharmaceutical firms to seek out new anticoagulants that would increase their profit potential. They sought to address two of the chief problems with warfarin: the high risk of potentially fatal uncontrolled bleeding events, and the requirement for frequent blood testing that made using the drug inconvenient for the patient. Xarelto was one of the drugs that resulted from this effort.
Xarelto was approved by the FDA for use as an anticoagulant in 2011 and is one of a group of drugs known collectively as new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). These drugs were the first anticoagulants released since the approval of warfarin in the 1950s. The chief benefit manufacturers Janssen Pharmaceuticals (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson) and Bayer AG touted at the time was that Xarelto doesn’t require frequent blood testing or dietary restrictions because Xarelto doesn’t affect the levels of vitamin K in the blood. The active ingredient in Xarelto, rivaroxaban, works by binding to factor Xa, a substance that prevents the enzyme thrombin from forming. Without thrombin, the protein fibrinogen cannot be converted to fibrin, without which a blood clot cannot form.
Xarelto can also affect the way certain drugs function, while other drugs can impact the way that Xarelto functions, including:
- Other anticoagulant drugs such as warfarin, Pradaxa, Eliquis, etc.
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen
- Antibiotics and antifungal drugs such as erythromycin and fluconazole
- Some heart medications
- Some medications used to treat circulation or blood disordersJohnson and Johnson failed to mention many of these and this action has cause individuals to file a lawsuit
Legal cases against Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson suffered a setback in 2018 when a Pennsylvania state court judge overturned $27.8 million that a jury awarded to an Indiana couple, Lynn Hartman and her husband. The amount awarded was $1.8 million in compensatory damages and $26 million in punitive damages. Like many other plaintiffs, they had argued Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson failed to warn them of internal bleeding risks associated with their drug Xarelto. Fortunately, she has made a full recovery.
Although Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson stated they stand “…behind the safety and efficacy of Xarelto and will continue to defend it vigorously,” there is evidence they rushed studies and manipulated results to hide the fact that there is no known antidote for Xarelto and its dangerous side effects.
The most common argument brought by plaintiffs is the risks of uncontrolled bleeding, for which they argue they were not properly warned. The lack of an antidote and proper oversight has led to several hundred deaths and countless more suffering injuries.
Big pharmaceutical companies have armies of lawyers working them and the funding to continue defending themselves, making it difficult to argue against the dangers of the drugs they market and sell. Bayer AG and Johnson & Johnson expect to make $4 billion from the marketing and sales of Xarelto in 2019 alone.
Set the setback of one settlement being overturned has not deterred attorneys. Michael Weinkowitz, one of Hartman’s attorneys, stated the decision related to a “very narrow issue related to Mrs. Hartman’s prescribing physician” and is looking forward to trying more Xarelto-related cases. Lawsuits like this inevitably take a long time. Yet, websites such as SideEffectsofXarelto.org and others across the country continue to pool resources and information in the continued fight to protect the public from improperly marketed drugs.
The majority of the lawsuits brought by patients argue the manufacturer prioritized profits over safety, putting patients at undue risk. Attorneys argue that Bayer AG and Janssen rushed the drug through clinical trials to get it to market despite a lack of an antidote and adequate warning of the known risks, particularly the uncontrollable bleeding.
Xarelto is often marketed as a safer anticoagulant alternative to Warfarin. It is commonly prescribed for people with atrial fibrillation, a common heart rhythm disorder, to treat and reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolisms.
Without a known and approved antidote, you could be facing undue risks for which the consequences could be quite severe, even life-threatening. If you are taking Xarelto, speak to your medical professionals about these complications. They will be able to provide you the appropriate information about the side effects, whether they recommend you take it for your condition, and you will know if you can file a lawsuit.
An injury due to a drug that was supposed to help you can be among the most frightening things you could ever experience. But you’re not alone. You shouldn’t have to be.
Patients who are allergic to rivaroxaban should avoid Xarelto. Xarelto should also not be taken by patients with an artificial heart valve or active or uncontrolled bleeding. Xarelto poses serious risks to patients who undergo spinal tap or epidural procedures because it can cause blood clots along the spinal cord that can lead to paralysis, especially in patients who have a genetic spinal defect, patients with a spinal catheter, and patients who are taking NSAIDs or other anticoagulants. If you were not aware of this, contact us immediately to file a lawsuit.
Xarelto can also cause bleeding events in patients who have genetic or disease-related bleeding disorders, high blood pressure, intestinal bleeding or ulcers, or hemorrhagic stroke.
While Xarelto and other NOACs did help address the obstacle of frequent blood testing posed by warfarin, they posed significant health risks, thus failing to address the chief concern warfarin raised. Pradaxa, the first of the NOAC to reach the market in 2010, resulted in such a high rate of severe side effects that physicians began to move away from NOACs and back to warfarin by 2014.
One of the chief risks posed by all anticoagulant drugs is that of an uncontrolled bleeding episode. When this occurs, the key point of comparison for anticoagulants is the remedies available to halt bleeding. Antidotes are the first line of defense against a deadly episode of uncontrolled bleeding, and Xarelto does not have an antidote. Without a reliable antidote, bleeding events in Xarelto patients can become life-threatening relatively quickly. Warfarin has several antidotes, which can reverse the anticoagulant effects of the drug within 15 minutes to 24 hours. Without treatment, the effects of the drug will wear off on their own within 3 to 5 days. Xarelto does wear off more quickly than warfarin, but in cases in which a rapid reversal of effects is required, such as a serious injury with excessive bleeding, Xarelto can pose a far greater risk than warfarin.
Lynn Hartman 2018 case update: The jury sided Hartman and she was awarded $27.8 million.
In 2014, a review of cases of serious injury and death reported to the FDA showed that Xarelto patients had the highest rates of severe side effects, with as many as 525 cases reported, a far greater number than warfarin. It also failed to adequately treat blood clotting disorders more often than warfarin.